Thursday, June 16, 2005

After Midnight

After midnight, we’re gonna let it all hang out
After midnight, we’re gonna chug-a-lug and shout
We’re gonna cause talk and suspicion
Give an exhibition
Find out what it is all about

After midnight, we’re gonna let it all hang out
After midnight, gonna shake your tambourine
After midnight, it’s gonna be peaches and cream
We’re gonna cause talk and suspicion
Give an exhibition
Find out what it is all about

After midnight, we’re gonna let it all hang out
After midnight, we’re gonna let it all hang out

JJ Cale

Here is one very politically incorrect Aggie.

And, let's hope it is a joke.

Former Bush Team Member Says
WTC Collapse Likely A Controlled Demolition And 'Inside Job'

The Arctic Beacon
June 12, 2005
By Greg Szymanski

A former chief economist in the Labor Department during President Bush's first term now believes the official story about the collapse of the WTC is 'bogus,' saying it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7."If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling," said Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D, a former member of the Bush team who also served as director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis headquartered in Dallas, TX.

Reynolds, now a professor emeritus at Texas A&M University, also believes it's 'next to impossible' that 19 Arab Terrorists alone outfoxed the mighty U.S. military, adding the scientific conclusions about the WTC collapse may hold the key to the entire mysterious plot behind 9/11."It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate over the cause(s) of the collapse of the twin towers and building 7," said Reynolds this week from his offices at Texas A&M.

"If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely to be correct either. The government's collapse theory is highly vulnerable on its own terms. Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapse of the three buildings."

"More importantly, momentous political and social consequences would follow if impartial observers concluded that professionals imploded the WTC. Meanwhile, the job of scientists, engineers and impartial researchers everywhere is to get the scientific and engineering analysis of 9/11 right."

However, Reynolds said "getting it right in today's security state' remains challenging because he claims explosives and structural experts have been intimidated in their analyses of the collapses of 9/11.

From the beginning, the Bush administration claimed that burning jet fuel caused the collapse of the towers. Although many independent investigators have disagreed, they have been hard pressed to disprove the government theory since most of the evidence was removed by FEMA prior to independent investigation."


We could maybe pass this off as fringeware.

After all, who the heck is the Arctic Beacon?

But, here is same story from the Washington Times, which is about as conservative as you can get. And the story itself came from United Press International.

Back on April 28th, David Ray Griffin, a recent professor emeritus at the Claremont School of Theology, gave this talk on C Span.

Professor Griffin argues that "omissions and distortions" in the 9/11 report amount to a cover-up by government officials and says that the available evidence suggests that the Bush administration was complicit in the 9/11 attacks.

This is pretty rough stuff.

I can handle that the first election was settled as a result of activist judges acting in behalf of their benefactors.

I can handle that the second one was stolen by activist businessmen in league with party officials who conspired to control the voting machines to give a bogus vote count.

I can handle that the intelligence was fixed to justify a war for oil.

But, the American mind is not capable of handling this.

It's too much.

I cannot handle that the government would sacrifice its own citizens

to turn a nation towards War.

But there is an Aggie and a Preacher

who think that the evidence suggest exactly that.

If it is true,

It is indeed

after midnight.

For the earthfamily.

And we may have something to fear,

besides fear itself.

We’re gonna cause talk and suspicion
Give an exhibition
Find out what it is all about

After midnight, we’re gonna let it all hang out
After midnight, we’re gonna let it all hang out


Earthfamily Principles

Earthfamilyalpha Content


*

5 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

As you say, the mind cannot fathom this, yet there are unexplained facts that the government should clarify so that we can put this to rest.

7:00 AM  
Blogger OZ said...

There are legitimate questions that should be addressed, for example, why was building 7 seemingly pulled down?

The lack of any signs of a Boeing at the Pentagon crash site also merits clarification.

Presumably,there are other explainations for these anomalies besides the one that Dr. Reynolds holds.

By the way, I did check on Reynolds and he is at A and M, or at least he was, and the story did apparently come from there, as weird as it all seems.

I also double checked the UPI reference.

8:24 AM  
Blogger memo said...

"...and it was revealed today that the collapse of the bonfire at A&M was orchestrated by "greens" within that university seeking to end the senseless burning of post oak forest."

6:42 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

the post that preceed this one, seem to all hang together well.

2:23 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

this is completely out of bounds. anyone who thinks that this admistration would allow or condone this, is totally lost in his own conspiratorial madness.

1:11 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home